Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate

Went to a bunch of thrift/antique stores today. Look!

But I didn't buy anything.  :(

I saw these at an antique store in Davenport. I had always wanted to see these in person, but they were in AWFUL shape. All around $200, too. Why would these be so much?

Price: $178. Said year 1958. That's wrong, right?


Price: $178. Said 1950s style.



Price: $178. Also said "1950s style".


Price: $295. Read "Approx 1960s"


Couple of other oldies. really awful shape:



And saw a giant? Grande? China lamp though. And cloudy.


Views: 396

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I actually don't have any interest in owning those lamps due to their condition. While I was excited to see them, it was so sad to see the shape they were in.

Also, I'm not one to haggle. I'm horribly passive aggressive. ;)

Though I would like to own a Consort someday, I wouldn't ever purchase on in that condition.

Thanks again for all your input. Very nice to read!
Thanks. Hope someone here gets 'em somehow and fixes 'em up.
I should also note that if anyone WAS interested in them to let me know and I'd see about getting them purchased for someone. I'd haggle for someone else!

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Latest Activity

Labelling Machine updated their profile
Monday
Clark Fury is now a member of Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate
Oct 1
Claude J replied to Ant Bee's discussion Trying to crack the original formula- why was kerosene used?
Sep 30
WARLOCK OF GOO! replied to Ant Bee's discussion Trying to crack the original formula- why was kerosene used?
Sep 30
Profile IconShirley and I Luv metallic Lava joined Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate
Sep 25
I Luv metallic Lava updated their profile
Sep 24
Danae is now a member of Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate
Sep 19
Claude J replied to Ant Bee's discussion Trying to crack the original formula- why was kerosene used?
Sep 10

GooHeads

© 2025   Created by Autumn.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service