1974 Century and 2000 Aristocrat

The 1974 is actually an aqua liquid with light blue wax. In real life, it doesn't look like the lava is green at all. The 2000, I believe, is a faded 24, based on the fact that the # on the bottlecap is 124.

View Full Size

Tags:
Albums: 70s Lamps
Location: Bettendorf, IA

Comment

You need to be a member of Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate to add comments!

Join Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate

Comment by storm98 on September 15, 2010 at 11:14am: Thank you! The red one took a couple weeks to flow properly. I checked out your thread. I agree with what LampHead posted. I picked up some fog juice today and I am going to try it on the Aztec in the pic below as the salt solution has clouded it.

Comment by Erin on September 14, 2010 at 7:11pm: Wow, yours look great storm98. :)

I thought all the Centuries had a heat ring. I've tried a clear and frosted.

The wax just looks so funky in mine. Almost like it's too thin or something: http://oozinggoo.ning.com/forum/topics/1974-lamp-weird-flow

Comment by storm98 on September 14, 2010 at 6:53pm: A 1974 wouldnt have a heat ring. I'm not an overheating expert by any means but I would try a clear 40w first. I have 2 70's Centuries and have no problem using clear 40's in them. They can run 24x7 without any problems. Red is a 65-70 2-piece Century base. No date on the blue sadly. I would guess early 70.

Comment by Erin on September 14, 2010 at 6:25pm: Yep, it flows OK for awhile, but about 2 or so hours in, a giant chunk starts residing at the top and then 4+ hours in, giant blobs of lava hang out in the middle. I found out it's missing the heat ring, too.

Comment by Erin on September 14, 2010 at 3:38pm: I like it, too. It's faded though. It looks like green/lite green.

Comment by storm98 on September 14, 2010 at 3:21pm: I love the blue/green with the gold base. I have one just like yours. Lava Lite should have kept this combo.