Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate

Someone said this may be a “rare 104”. What do y’all think? (Stamp on base JUL 71, sticker in globe says  June 1971) 

Views: 187

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Seems like it might be. It’s hard to tell because after years of running/sunlight/natural fading makes the definitive answer hard to come by.

I *think I have a very faded 104 with a copper two part base but maybe it’s another color combo that isn’t listed in the lava library… it’s been bothering me for years. If only we had the original boxes! 

Yes, I see. I guess it’s going to be hard to determine since it’s not listed on the lamp and I have no box. Dang. Love the two part base. One like that is still on my bucket list ;) I’ve attached a few more of mine for you to check out. Someone said it may be a faded blue/ green?? Someone said it may be an orange prototype???? I’m even more confused now. I just wish I knew for sure!!!!

Attachments:

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Latest Activity

Clark Fury is now a member of Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate
yesterday
Claude J replied to Ant Bee's discussion Trying to crack the original formula- why was kerosene used?
Tuesday
WARLOCK OF GOO! replied to Ant Bee's discussion Trying to crack the original formula- why was kerosene used?
Tuesday
Profile IconShirley and I Luv metallic Lava joined Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate
Sep 25
I Luv metallic Lava updated their profile
Sep 24
Danae is now a member of Oozing Goo - The Lava Lamp Syndicate
Sep 19
Claude J replied to Ant Bee's discussion Trying to crack the original formula- why was kerosene used?
Sep 10
WARLOCK OF GOO! replied to Ant Bee's discussion Trying to crack the original formula- why was kerosene used?
Sep 10

GooHeads

© 2025   Created by Autumn.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service