I have had this for about 10 years, and have never seen another one. I don't believe they were ever in catalogs. Could this be a prototype from the first few years? The cord is white and end plug is the same as my black and white squiggles. There is a small area around the lip opening where the chrome plating has chipped away revealing the typical brushed brass underneath. The base is like a cast aluminum with a patina.
fog rider also wrote an artice about Consort lamps that shows a picture of the same type of lamp. It can be found here. Click on the Consort.doc link to download. http://oozinggoo.ning.com/forum/topics/1566398:Topic:30083?page=1&a...">
Looks like a fairly uncommon lamp. Where did you find it or how did you come into posession of it?
I actually got this on E-bay around 2000. If I am not mistaken I paid less than a few bucks for it. When I got it then, I knew it was pretty odd and rare. I have heard of the Nordic, but didn't know this was one.
EVERYTHING is original on this, no refills, no switches on anything! There is a small reflector in there, and I tend to take it out so it continues the "serpentine" effects. Otherwise it overheats, even on a 15 watt bulb!
I saw, once, a wholesale catalog that listed this as a "Nordic", but I have no idea why I don't seem to have that picture now. This Wishbook is the only other catalog reference I've ever seen. I'm eagerly awaiting finding Lava Lite company catalogs from the 1970s, I know none to exist from the period of 1970-75.
Note that the Aristocrat shown appears to be (maybe? Am I just imagining this?) the known variant with the tall, narrow upper cone on the base.
What's strange is that the lamps themselves look extremely similar. But in my time following Mathmos, I've never seen a bottom like that, plus its cap doesn't match the Crestworth Nordic. I'm also a bit skeptical that Lava and Crestworth would use the same name (which very seldom happens)...
The base does look awesome in a Lava Lites kind of way, and if it is theirs would make its overall look as unique as anything. I really wish we had better context, explanation or ad stuff to explain this. I just wonder if it has a label and what Google might say about that...